【23xiu.com-爱上秀-教育信息门户网】
广东宋劲松澳大利亚受害女大学生导游照片宋劲松老婆是谁澳大利亚《时代报》7日报道，一名中国政府代表团官员被控访澳期间强奸女大学生导游。被告43岁，在广州从事与城市规划有关的工作，现已缴纳374万元人民币保释金。7日被告在墨尔本出庭，其律师宣称“确凿证据显示，若被告不回国，其工作单位将有50人被解雇”。网友@大鹏看天下： 查阅资料，广东省城乡规划设计研究院确有一名副院长“宋劲松”。
Chinese delegate to Melbourne charged with rape of student Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/national/chinese-delegate-to-melbourne-charged-with-rape-of-student-最新或2022（历届）年1107-2x3w2.html#ixzz2k4IJht8z A member of a Chinese delegation to Melbourne has 08160.cn been charged with raping a university student tour guide assigned to his group. Jingsong Song, 43, the head of a Chinese government urban planning institute, has been reporting daily to police in Melbourne since his arrest and extradition from NSW three months ago. Song was bailed in August, on strict conditions that included surrendering his passport with orders he not leave Victoria or Australia, on charges that included two allegations of digital rape. He appeared in Melbourne Magistrates Court on Thursday to apply to vary his bail to allow his return to China, to report daily in Guangzhon City and return once a month to Victoria.
Advertisement Magistrate Donna Bakos heard Song was also prepared to put up a $500,000 cash deposit and two friends a total of $150,000 in sureties to help ensure he answered his bail. Detective Senior Constable Ross Waring opposed the application on the grounds there was no extradition treaty between Australia and China – whose policy was not to extradite its nationals – so "there is no way for us to bring him back" if he breached his bail conditions. Song's wife and a work colleague flew to Melbourne to give evidence before Ms Bakos at the application. She told Ms Bakos she needed him home to be with her for her impending surgery and because their five-year-old daughter also had health issues. She knew if he did not return to Australia they would lose the $500,000, which was their life savings, while his friend gave evidence that Song was trustworthy and that "whatever he promises, he will do it". "Mr Song will come back to face these charges," he said through an interpreter. In support of the application, defence barrister Daniel Gurvich said the prosecution case could not be regarded as strong given the "level of intoxication" of his client and the woman and the content of pretext conversations.